Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

Education

Connection

Connection: the human need that precedes all technology

Connection is one of the most used words of our time and, paradoxically, also one of the most misunderstood. We immediately associate it with technology, social networks, and the possibility of being always reachable. But on a scientific and human level, connection is much more: it is a fundamental property of living systems, an organizing principle that spans biology, psychology, and social sciences.

Every organism lives because it is connected, first and foremost, to itself: cells communicating, neurons synchronizing, networks self-regulating. At the same time, no human being can exist without relational, affective, and symbolic connections.

Social neuroscience studies show that the human brain is structurally predisposed to relationships: areas involved in processing physical pain are also activated in cases of social exclusion, indicating that the lack of connection is experienced as a primary threat.

Connection, therefore, is not an “optional” for well-being, but a necessary condition for global health. Psychologically, feeling connected means experiencing continuity, belonging, and meaning; socially, it means participating in networks of exchange that regulate trust, cooperation, and solidarity. From this perspective, discussing connection is equivalent to questioning how individuals build bonds, shared meanings, and identities. And this is precisely where the exploration of its multiple facets begins.

What does “connection” really mean from a scientific perspective?

In the scientific field, the term connection refers to a functional link between elements of a system, capable of producing effects that cannot be explained by observing the individual parts in isolation. This idea spans different disciplines and allows us to understand complex phenomena such as consciousness, social behavior, and mental health. To clarify the concept, it is useful to distinguish some fundamental dimensions of connection:

  • Biological connection

Biologically, connection concerns continuous communication between cells, organs, and systems. The nervous system, for example, functions as a highly interconnected network: every experience modifies the strength of synaptic connections, giving rise to learning and memory processes. Effective connection ensures adaptation and resilience; altered connection can contribute to neurological and psychiatric disorders.

  • Cognitive connection

Cognitively, connection refers to how information is integrated. Thinking means linking data, emotions, and past experiences into coherent patterns. Difficulties in cognitive connection are evident in conditions such as fragmented thinking or information overload, increasingly common in digital societies.

  • Social connection

Socially, connection describes the quality of bonds between individuals and groups. It is not just the number of relationships that matters, but their depth and reciprocity. Research shows that meaningful social networks reduce the risk of depression, anxiety, and early mortality.

In all these dimensions, connection emerges as a dynamic process, not a fixed state, which requires maintenance and self-awareness.

How does connection influence psychological well-being?

The quality of the connections a person experiences has a direct impact on their emotional balance and self-perception. Contemporary psychology considers connection one of the pillars of well-being, alongside autonomy and competence. When connections are stable and meaningful, the individual develops a sense of security that fosters exploration and personal growth. Several aspects help to understand this deep link:

  • Emotional regulation

Connected and reliable relationships facilitate emotional regulation. Social support acts as a stress “buffer,” reducing physiological activation linked to difficult situations. This effect is particularly evident in stable affective bonds.

  • Identity formation

Personal identity is formed through mutual recognition. Feeling seen and understood allows integration of the different parts of the self, whereas lack of connection can foster feelings of emptiness or alienation.

  • Prevention of psychological distress

Social isolation is considered a significant risk factor for depression and anxiety disorders. In contrast, authentic connection promotes resilience and the ability to face traumatic events.

These data suggest that taking care of one’s connections is not a romantic or optional gesture, but a concrete strategy for psychological prevention.

What is the role of connection in contemporary social dynamics?

In modern societies, connection takes increasingly complex and ambivalent forms. On one hand, technology has multiplied opportunities for contact; on the other hand, it has transformed the quality of interactions.

Understanding these dynamics is essential to assess the social impacts of connection:

  • Digital networks and human relationships

Social networks allow maintaining long-distance relationships, but often encourage superficial connections. Sociological studies indicate that high digital exposure does not guarantee a real sense of belonging and can, in some cases, exacerbate perceived loneliness.

  • Connection and social capital

Connection contributes to building social capital, i.e., the set of resources derived from relationships of trust and cooperation. Connected communities show a greater ability to face economic and health crises.

  • Relational inequalities

Not everyone has equal access to quality connections. Factors such as poverty, exclusion, and discrimination can limit relational opportunities, with cumulative effects on individual and collective well-being. In this scenario, connection also becomes a political and cultural issue, tied to building more inclusive and supportive societies.

Why can lack of connection become a public health issue?

In recent years, loneliness has been recognized as a genuine health risk factor. Lack of connection concerns not only the absence of relationships but also the subjective perception of not being part of a meaningful network. This phenomenon has measurable consequences:

  • Effects on the body

Chronic isolation is associated with increased systemic inflammation, cardiovascular disorders, and weakened immune system. Social connection, on the other hand, has a documented protective effect.

  • Impact on mental health

Prolonged loneliness increases the risk of depression, cognitive decline, and sleep disorders. In particular, in older adults, lack of connection is linked to accelerated cognitive deterioration.

  • Social and economic costs

Disconnection generates high indirect costs, related to increased demand for health and social services. For this reason, many public health programs are including interventions aimed at strengthening social networks.

How can we cultivate healthier and more meaningful connections?

Cultivating healthy connections is neither spontaneous nor automatic: it requires intentionality, relational skills, and supportive contexts. Research shows that the quality of connections depends less on the frequency of contacts and more on the ability to create spaces of real presence, where attention is not constantly fragmented.

In this sense, slowing down becomes a relational act: reducing the speed of interactions allows for greater emotional and cognitive attunement, promoting more authentic exchanges. Active listening plays a central role, understood not only as a communication technique but as a mental stance capable of recognizing the other in their complexity, without reducing them to a role or function. Likewise, the ability to tolerate disagreement contributes to the quality of connections: mature relationships do not eliminate conflict but transform it into an opportunity for negotiation and mutual growth.

Educationally and organizationally, cultivating connections means designing environments that foster cooperation, trust, and a sense of belonging. Schools, social services, workplaces, and local communities can become true “relational ecosystems,” where people are not just users or resources, but active nodes of a meaningful network.

Self-care practices, such as emotional awareness and reflection on one’s relational patterns, also help improve the quality of connections, reducing defensive automatisms and misunderstandings. Scientific evidence shows that technological availability does not automatically guarantee meaningful relationships. On the contrary, the quality of connections depends on their ability to engage the body, emotions, and social context. Investing in healthy connections ultimately means investing in the possibility of more resilient societies, capable of sustaining global well-being over time.

Bibliography
  • Babür, B. G., & Baek, E. C. (2024). Neuroscience of Social Connection. Subjective Well-Being and Life Satisfaction, 61-77.
  • Baek, E. C., & Parkinson, C. (2022). Shared understanding and social connection: Integrating approaches from social psychology, social network analysis, and neuroscience. Social and personality psychology compass, 16(11), e12710.
  • Courtney, A. L., & Meyer, M. L. (2020). Self-other representation in the social brain reflects social connection. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(29), 5616-5627.
  • Jennings, V., & Bamkole, O. (2019). The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: An avenue for health promotion. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(3), 452.
  • Orazani, S. N., Reynolds, K. J., & Osborne, H. (2023). What works and why in interventions to strengthen social cohesion: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(10), 938-995.
  • Qi, J., Mazumdar, S., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2024). Understanding the relationship between urban public space and social cohesion: A systematic review. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 7(2), 155-212.
  • Redcay, E., & Schilbach, L. (2019). Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction. Nature reviews neuroscience, 20(8), 495-505.
  • Song, J., Corcoran, J., & Zahnow, R. (2025). The resettlement journey: understanding the role of social connectedness on well-being and life satisfaction among (Im) migrants and refugees: a systematic review. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 12(4), 2128-2144.
  • Weisz, E., & Zaki, J. (2018). Motivated empathy: a social neuroscience perspective. Current opinion in psychology, 24, 67-71.
  • Wickramaratne, P. J., Yangchen, T., Lepow, L., Patra, B. G., Glicksburg, B., Talati, A., … & Weissman, M. M. (2022). Social connectedness as a determinant of mental health: A scoping review. PloS one, 17(10), e0275004.
References
  • https://www.dors.it/2025/07/la-connessione-sociale-una-strategia-contro-la-solitudine-e-lisolamento/ Accessed February 2026
  • https://www.everyone4mentalhealth.it/il-potere-delle-connessioni-cinque-abitudini-positive-per-una-vita-piu-lunga-e-in-salute/ Accessed February 2026
  • https://www.my-personaltrainer.it/benessere/relazioni-sociali-e-salute-perche-una-rete-solida-aumenta-la-sopravvivenza-del-50.html Accessed February 2026
  • https://www.socialconnectionguidelines.org/en Accessed February 2026
  • https://theconversation.com/social-connection-is-crucial-to-well-being-new-public-health-guidelines-aim-to-build-healthier-lives-and-communities-247087 Accessed February 2026
Images

Be part of the change. Sharing content responsibly is a gesture that stands for sustainability.

Let’s train emotional intelligence: what emotion does this article evoke in you?

Loading spinner

Subscribe to the newsletter